|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-5-12 17:00:18
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 美国
阶段性的总结一下、希望对后来者有帮助：8 e# P9 d6 x5 V) d$ c1 H4 `
% i) K+ `; x0 H) Q5 ~8 u- ?8 }5 r
网友wumatao和wuzhijian分享的经验：另存一下，似乎会减小文件大小，不妨试试
( h( Y& Q4 ~* f' ~【我验证过、很有效、装配体文件大小可以从几百M变成1.9M】
4 ^. P8 O7 U- {; R1 z o$ `4 Q! e$ q4 w/ t1 [( L
& m; ~, W0 R3 W; V1 _* x
另外、后来在网上看到一些遇到相同问题的讨论：0 X+ r) i: w' D3 o9 v+ }: z
2 ^8 a$ m- m8 f8 [0 D————————tdx99+ Q" f% G0 C/ J% @/ e7 N
Hello All,
7 O _4 c& G3 q6 W/ s
) I# K) C3 `: H6 rI was asked to look into an issue with apart that an engineer designed. The saved part is
4 R1 C0 C! p( M* w* F# l4 u8 l85megs! The part hasabout 100 features. One of my part with about the same number of
. p4 G+ M6 T% ^+ B ifeatures is less then10 megs. Both the engineer and Iare fairly new to SW so I couldn't
9 P+ {$ n( g) L& K9 afigure out what the problem was.All features weremade from simple extrusions, cuts,
* O% |- o& Q6 M F9 X+ a Y3 lpatterns, chamfers, rounds. No complicated surfaces and not drafted yet. I did notice that
8 v4 q9 C: J) j4 l2 d9 ~a lot of the extrusion and cut features were created as thins.3 f: t3 R# o8 T
0 V$ a6 V O; X/ J/ ?' n' gI would hate to have to recreate the part.
: v8 E, P# a$ [; }/ @& S$ L% L) F# v* g$ o& n
Any help would be appreciated.
- z `9 P, C0 P, \' Z# R) B$ Y6 Q1 W2 E0 [: v& N
Thank you,
2 I& Z3 x, A* W3 g5 Q' u0 J% d6 p: `
: F# j. I9 r: |( }! N6 ?! M( G——————————Metoo: Q& r2 J5 S% q r: H
This is a problem in Solidworks; two people can design the same identical part and the two
' u2 P5 n1 t) J8 Q) xpart file sizes can vary widely. If one made lots of changes; rebuilt his model numerous
3 Y6 s& C- G$ A, o# m. M: m5 J- ltimes withmoved features in the tree; added and removed constraints, modified scetches,
; |$ M0 Y0 H6 O- Betc, etc..., that file will grow and grow and grow.
0 L8 Q% n: j8 Z, e @. R' z
5 _) A8 b3 ?8 t d( hHere's the question - do you really need the feature tree? If its a simple part, then its 10 - * X1 j* h" p2 e; W
15 minutes to redo. If its a complex part, then the feature tree is worthless anyway; save it ) G" ]6 t8 M* m' k
out as an iges or parasolid and bring it back in as dumb surface/solid. If you need to make
' _: S8 R0 `8 w$ O* T" x: [changes to it afterwards, then cut off what isn't needed and add what is. There's nothing
; S$ _# h# r9 o, d0 [: Tmystical or magical about having a feature history with a part model.
# n. h% A3 `; {0 H# a
$ U J- H( o3 ]' x& [——————————tdx99) R' ^: Y: }. I% O7 q0 H
Thanks for shedding some light on the problem. We had a design review and quite a few
' g+ ]/ G! i9 D2 X: gchanges were made. Now the file is over 140meg. It takes about a minute to save the darn
" G3 y9 G# ^9 j) t9 K3 Z8 Lpart now. Is there any way to purge.. or trim the fat off of this thing? It is getting to the
* \( A! |0 O7 Y J1 {7 S5 ipoint where it would be better to recreate the part.
: c) a. z* j& L0 O% }# D# r: j3 \4 t+ V, b, L; J- M3 l
——————————Meto. L G/ w( ?1 v a: C
First; get rid of all the fluff; studio, lighting, background graphics; all the stuff that has ' }! h7 c; B; R0 p6 B1 _, I$ Q/ G
nothing to do with the part design. Go to your file options, and check the graphics display E+ _: \, n0 I) u- W! o
resolution to be sure it isn't unreasonably set high, as well as associated setting. When all 3 K6 b& \/ X0 X' _ r/ r# |" ^
else fails, remodel the part.
" x6 e, K9 J' z: P* p' T4 E# i6 x6 h. J- ^( W/ A3 \- g
I have noticed that similar files have exhibited a size reduction when opened and saved in ; e v" L- e6 Q u* s1 C+ U
next higher version of Solidworks. This recently happened when the company I was
~0 F- Q5 {8 x+ F: F1 q7 `: pcontracting for moved from 2007 to 2008.A mold part I was working onsaved in 2008 at 9 M, w7 N5 b* x0 ]2 |9 f3 {' A
about half the size as in 2007. That filealso had numerous changes to it, and I was about 9 b0 t: d9 I# ?/ \1 L" n9 K) z
to save it out as a parasolid and bring it back in as a dumb model to reduce the size of
- z0 q: I0 ~' M9 Hassembly file before I noticed the part size dropped from about 100 meg to about 55 meg.! P2 c5 }1 I* G$ `& u1 e% e1 L$ ]6 `
; @* l( @0 Q) C" {: x/ g; p——————————ProE_Addict
! C! A6 V. @4 @# d6 U* b4 c4 PI don't recommend "saving out and bring it back in as dumb geometry." At that point 1 E- U( E; X. g. Q
you've just spent a lot of time creating your masterpiece only to destroy thebeauty of the 1 x k7 z3 ?6 J) N0 q: o% v- c
parametric software.
: m7 V$ t6 a; L7 Q3 o8 h! e& h2 z
4 d+ N9 p$ j9 Y3 C! J! L5 cIf you can, do a File, Save As. This usually does the trick. I believe SW saves a lot of history
3 Y$ J" Q4 A3 `- ^2 {data within each file. When you do a Save As, that history goes bye-bye and you start fresh.: F9 b8 K' X2 |; l
* I# v' m! h) X, t- R% ?" s$ ~——————————FireWild
. n/ a' s+ v* p% zI had this same problem with a Solid Works Part a few months ago I tried the save as trick
/ D8 o" Z/ l" L, R/ aand it did not work I even sent it in to Support and they were not able to figure it out either. For the record I've never had this problem with a Pro-e part.
( }0 O- W ~: h4 P$ w; P1 ]. _0 \: [3 @5 w: [+ G: `3 G9 i' ?+ F
——————————michael3130: A+ m% [; ^4 @, r N
Yes, absolutely you need the feature tree.
5 G3 Z/ y% Q! h1 W9 K
0 Y8 N2 E" ?0 p e% C% HIf its a complicated part, the feature tree is worthless if you don't know how to model a
# |$ G. [, H% Y) Zpart properly. Seeting out a plan from the start to build your part, anticipating as best you
- p( t9 e n7 u3 {* @2 Bcan changes that may occur in the future and through past experience, a complicated part
/ V, [7 { p! v& M. N2 w, v1 \can be adjusted from the very 1st feature very successfully. It very much comes down to 7 r7 o# R, u0 L) Y$ Y1 S% p
the skill of the CAD user and this is one of the areas that makes the difference between
/ I& }7 @7 l5 C I3 |# gsomeone who says they can use a 3D CAD package and someone who can actually use it.4 v2 `" D" J! R" Z! B; m+ `
4 s' A8 n ?# L7 uIf the tree was useless, there would be no posts from users on this forum looking for
; q. s& K. J3 K- ?3 cworkarounds to the problem of saving to an earlier version of the software. Though as I'm : j d, k% P" n- T- e$ `0 U5 o2 R$ i3 \
sure you will see if you look that there are many.' b) {8 \% `2 I5 ]
( L8 m1 Z$ }/ M) `% @( Q |
|
发表于 2015-5-9 19:26:56
发表于 2015-5-11 10:55:02
欢迎发表～～& d6 C- u O7 G7 N/ M, q
、覆盖上一个 另存为......
发表于 2015-5-13 20:09:48
