|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-5-12 17:00:18
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 美国
阶段性的总结一下、希望对后来者有帮助：
) c+ w9 W& X, v6 v9 h8 p: L/ P! ]+ f; h6 v0 i. R) m7 T) n G; W, L
网友wumatao和wuzhijian分享的经验：另存一下，似乎会减小文件大小，不妨试试
9 L) ]) m u7 N- `【我验证过、很有效、装配体文件大小可以从几百M变成1.9M】" `' N4 ] l, M1 j. V# I
" C# O# x6 \7 u
, i, v8 z+ u+ i/ z9 e/ }$ o另外、后来在网上看到一些遇到相同问题的讨论：. _+ w$ `2 h: S2 P( b1 \) N+ n
* U; s- z; P# G/ ]- N. ?: a- k8 q% z
————————tdx99
+ U6 p4 d5 k& Y. p' b+ y4 DHello All,0 M% J: O$ F) P1 H4 U& f1 n
: a# T5 m9 O' b, L6 ^
I was asked to look into an issue with apart that an engineer designed. The saved part is 8 w# h/ t- N' }, w) A2 }
85megs! The part hasabout 100 features. One of my part with about the same number of
6 u: n% a5 u: ]; {features is less then10 megs. Both the engineer and Iare fairly new to SW so I couldn't
" `5 J6 h9 _- h3 {' p' Kfigure out what the problem was.All features weremade from simple extrusions, cuts, : l/ J* a! ~1 S3 P9 V3 g% g
patterns, chamfers, rounds. No complicated surfaces and not drafted yet. I did notice that
1 E% D" t. P: k. N* xa lot of the extrusion and cut features were created as thins.4 b$ M! H4 U$ u% U
. v# X. a5 k. t7 Y) \ @I would hate to have to recreate the part.
( x1 U2 R- E1 a- R) E( B) d2 R6 z6 V
Any help would be appreciated.$ w1 [- ~" m, L: M5 Q
& P r: Y' Z& |" `, A( [2 |5 `* GThank you,6 `, Y( J4 `8 G8 _
8 j1 D5 ]. d( d, v5 H0 ]6 F——————————Metoo
& Q: b3 ` v& ]# D" U! J hThis is a problem in Solidworks; two people can design the same identical part and the two
1 F+ v2 z h- i7 i6 e" H6 p* jpart file sizes can vary widely. If one made lots of changes; rebuilt his model numerous
. m1 N3 w" \. m/ }( o( r2 h2 Ltimes withmoved features in the tree; added and removed constraints, modified scetches,
2 P/ ?1 _ l# \( I& z" Q7 g3 wetc, etc..., that file will grow and grow and grow. - \/ X6 P5 {$ `3 o1 e Q2 g0 G
) k) p' I6 j, P' o1 V+ D; J
Here's the question - do you really need the feature tree? If its a simple part, then its 10 -
, U* B$ [9 _( S1 L& I, I15 minutes to redo. If its a complex part, then the feature tree is worthless anyway; save it
3 y7 c. F: {4 o5 R% U, Jout as an iges or parasolid and bring it back in as dumb surface/solid. If you need to make
# c8 _; G7 t( W3 mchanges to it afterwards, then cut off what isn't needed and add what is. There's nothing " }8 H" v' I7 E( k& P( d' j! b
mystical or magical about having a feature history with a part model.
$ x9 t4 h) e# v! l7 J: M4 R0 R0 w2 q2 n' F6 {
——————————tdx99, u( y5 V, Q( Y) \
Thanks for shedding some light on the problem. We had a design review and quite a few 8 S8 ]& |. Z ~2 W- r8 i3 f9 Y
changes were made. Now the file is over 140meg. It takes about a minute to save the darn 9 h$ S% h0 }& E% g' p' i
part now. Is there any way to purge.. or trim the fat off of this thing? It is getting to the
( v% @8 y' @4 h( B# P# I/ }point where it would be better to recreate the part.) P" C+ }! G0 f) |( a/ p- H
: u( d/ X1 V3 U, V# o——————————Meto
! q/ i e( t& P/ q7 IFirst; get rid of all the fluff; studio, lighting, background graphics; all the stuff that has
, e- r( W1 T5 K2 V! qnothing to do with the part design. Go to your file options, and check the graphics display 5 z+ ~( G% L" @4 h- k1 e' o. G
resolution to be sure it isn't unreasonably set high, as well as associated setting. When all ' N/ ~# O' f6 [- s7 z7 f% u8 t
else fails, remodel the part.
& c& X9 v1 w [; s5 p
2 w" r) p+ |) zI have noticed that similar files have exhibited a size reduction when opened and saved in
, C; k( ?; o p& Z$ k* a. }next higher version of Solidworks. This recently happened when the company I was
4 b2 c' Y, A3 Fcontracting for moved from 2007 to 2008.A mold part I was working onsaved in 2008 at % v. x( s+ Q6 }9 K+ Y. F% L
about half the size as in 2007. That filealso had numerous changes to it, and I was about 7 q9 g( ^' J9 D. z8 P( S `
to save it out as a parasolid and bring it back in as a dumb model to reduce the size of
: Q& v6 U0 i G$ L5 R! G6 t% X+ Hassembly file before I noticed the part size dropped from about 100 meg to about 55 meg.1 m0 [" Y& } K0 C
+ X6 W0 d. |3 Y r# y——————————ProE_Addict
# _! S) U0 K2 b1 ?9 LI don't recommend "saving out and bring it back in as dumb geometry." At that point
$ _9 B; t {* y; _you've just spent a lot of time creating your masterpiece only to destroy thebeauty of the
: F C0 h: C* w; I9 {# nparametric software.
( |+ ]& q/ s/ z5 y8 z' k- ]* p/ X" Q4 u
If you can, do a File, Save As. This usually does the trick. I believe SW saves a lot of history
! Y' M; V$ v: V( kdata within each file. When you do a Save As, that history goes bye-bye and you start fresh.
, B& Q+ D5 Q) X9 v& m; \, ?# v& B; u: w% [) {
——————————FireWild
6 H: B& l+ u0 S! D4 uI had this same problem with a Solid Works Part a few months ago I tried the save as trick
: V, f9 f' J; s8 }% M: Uand it did not work I even sent it in to Support and they were not able to figure it out either. For the record I've never had this problem with a Pro-e part.( H/ X ? S7 y$ V5 | \ S1 A
0 f1 C) C! Z9 s) p" X——————————michael31307 w1 C3 o) |( F( ?
Yes, absolutely you need the feature tree.
5 u# d5 j, E( T0 |, N1 ?* Z! J. Y; n+ b- v0 r& ]5 Q% \
If its a complicated part, the feature tree is worthless if you don't know how to model a , b' f& u9 i7 w! t5 S
part properly. Seeting out a plan from the start to build your part, anticipating as best you
3 {( X: X) }* E- Fcan changes that may occur in the future and through past experience, a complicated part
- d. j$ e% O; _3 pcan be adjusted from the very 1st feature very successfully. It very much comes down to - V ?! c% y# D, L
the skill of the CAD user and this is one of the areas that makes the difference between
! p7 X5 i+ d% F6 m0 Msomeone who says they can use a 3D CAD package and someone who can actually use it.
" D5 x8 _ D: r% E) N2 t6 X3 K
1 s" K4 C! t3 d: {$ r5 yIf the tree was useless, there would be no posts from users on this forum looking for
( ~9 S, z _$ f+ S( W' @, Lworkarounds to the problem of saving to an earlier version of the software. Though as I'm : b3 t0 T: C' z- {
sure you will see if you look that there are many.
, v# n) b1 k9 `' ]1 e% j2 g" _& h3 H% p
|
|
发表于 2015-5-9 19:26:56
发表于 2015-5-11 10:55:02
欢迎发表～～% V+ W2 @3 l9 o8 a6 Q# q
、覆盖上一个 另存为......
发表于 2015-5-13 20:09:48
